1998 CERES Report
Electric and Gas Industries Form
© 1999 Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies
All Rights Reserved. Duplication in any form is prohibited without the express written consent of the publisher.
Contents
1. Company Profile 3
2. Environmental Policies, Organization and Management 7
Audits 10
3. Workplace Health and Safety 13
4. Community Participation and Accountability 15
Emergency Response 16
5. Product Stewardship 18
6. Supplier Relationships 20
Fuel Suppliers 20
Other Suppliers 20
7. Energy Acquisition, Conversion, Distribution, and Sales 23
Electricity 23
Generation 23
Transmission/Distribution 24
Sales 25
Natural Gas 25
Supply 25
Transportation and Distribution 26
Other Energy 26
8. Internal Use and Conservation of Natural Resources 27
9. Emissions and Waste 32
Routine Emissions 32
Spent Nuclear Material 34
Hazardous Waste 34
Non-hazardous Waste 35
Accidental Releases 37
Spill Prevention and Leak Detection 38
Overall Emissions and Waste 38
10. Compliance 39
11. Priorities and Challenges 41
CERES welcomes your comments and feedback on the content and format of our CERES Report form. Please direct any comments or criticism to:
CERES
11 Arlington Street
Boston, MA 02116-3411 USA
(617) 247-0700
(617) 267-5400 Fax
watt@ceres.org
Section 1: Company Profile
(Note: Feel free to provide any additional data or comments that you feel will clarify your answers.
If a question is not applicable, simply state this and provide a brief explanation.)
1-1. Name of Company: Green Mountain Power Corporation
1-2. Contact Person: Lee E. Marchessault Stephen C. Terry
Title: Environmental, Health Sr. Vice President
& Safety Manager
Address: 163 Acorn Lane
Colchester, VT 05446
Phone: (802) 655-8771 (802) 655-8408
Fax: (802) 655-8419 (802) 655-8406
E-mail:
marchessault@gmpvt.com terry@gmpvt.comParent Dun & Bradstreet Number: 00-793-9531
Corporate Tax ID Number: 030127430
Corporate Website: www.gmpvt.com
1-3. Time period (e.g., fiscal/calendar year) for which information is provided (unless otherwise noted):
Year-ended 1998
1-4. Please describe the core activities of your company:
The Company is an investor-owned energy services company located in Vermont that serves one-quarter of the state’s population.
1-5. Total worldwide employees:
1996: 389 1997: 369 1998: 294
Approximate number of full-time personnel assigned to environmental management and technical support worldwide (count those individuals in management positions who spend at least 50 percent of their time working in environmental areas. Identify any contract staff separately.): One.
1-6. Annual worldwide revenue:
1996: $100-200 million 1997: $100-200 million 1998: $100-200 million
1-7. What is your base country, or region, of operations? United States
Please describe regulated service territory, if any:
In 1998, Green Mountain Power had nine service centers located in Bellows Falls, Colchester, Montpelier, South Burlington (25 and 35 Green Mountain Drive), Wells River, White River Junction, Vergennes and Wilmington, Vermont.
Please indicate the number of employees in those countries where you have operations: 294
(Note: The following table is provided for illustration. Use the business sectors and geographic areas defined in your company’s annual report.)
|
|
Electricity |
Natural Gas |
Other |
|||||||
|
Region |
Gener ation |
T & D |
Whole sale |
Retail |
Supply |
Trans mission |
Distribu tion |
Whole sale |
Retail |
(etc.) |
|
United States |
||||||||||
|
Canada |
||||||||||
|
Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean |
||||||||||
|
Latin America |
||||||||||
|
Asia-Pacific |
||||||||||
|
Western Europe |
||||||||||
|
Central Europe |
||||||||||
|
Former USSR |
||||||||||
|
Middle East |
||||||||||
|
Africa |
||||||||||
|
Other (please specify) |
||||||||||
Comments:
1-8. Coverage of information provided in this report, including geographic scope (e.g., all activities, including purchased energy; generation facilities only; wholly-owned and majority-owned facilities):
Green Mountain Power owns and operates 11 generation facilities. These include: 1 wind plant; 8 hydro plants, two of which have fossil generation associated with them; and 2 fossil fuel plants, all of the plants are located in Vermont.
1-9. If all activities are not covered, please describe your projected time-line for including additional aspects of your operations in this report:
1-10. Please describe your company’s major business sectors and approximate percent of total 1998 worldwide revenues represented by each. For each sector, please describe the major activities in which your company’s operations are concentrated (e.g., generation/supply, transmission/ transportation, retail sales):
|
Sector |
% Revenues |
|
Electricity (please describe activities) |
100 (retail sales and generation) |
|
Natural Gas (please describe activities) |
N/A |
|
Other Energy (please describe activities) |
N/A |
|
Non-energy (please describe activities) |
N/A |
|
Total |
100% |
1-11. Please provide the following information on the scale of your operations. Report generation/supply based on ownership; for transmission/distribution/transportation operations and sales, include both self-supplied (generated) and purchased energy. Note that the same energy may be reported in more than one sector (e.g., electricity that you generate, transmit, and sell).
|
Sector |
Measure of Scale |
Amount |
|
Electricity |
||
Generation: |
total rated peak capacity (nameplate rating) in MW total MWh generated in 1998 |
110.0 MW 211,591.5 MWH |
Transmission |
km of right of way (69kV and above) total MWh transmitted in 1998 |
|
Distribution: |
km of right of way (below 69kV) total MWh distributed in 1998 |
1,840,948 |
Sales: |
peak demand in 1998 total MWh sold in 1998 MWh sold to residential customers MWh sold to industrial customers MWh sold to commercial customers MWh sold to other customers (please describe) (street lighting) |
312MW 1,840,948MWh 533,904MWh 636,436MWh 665,707MWh 4,862MWh |
|
Natural Gas |
||
Supply: |
total production in 1998 (Mm3) total reserves (Mm3) underground (natural) storage [not reserves] (Mm3) LNG storage (Mm3) |
|
Transportation: |
km of pipeline transmission capacity (Mm3 per day) annual throughput in 1998 (Mm3) |
|
Distribution: |
km of distribution network total design day deliverability (Mm3 per day) total throughput in 1998 (Mm3) |
|
Sales: |
total sold in 1998 (Mm3) Mm3 sold to residential customers Mm3 sold to residential customers Mm3 sold to residential customers Mm3 sold to residential customers |
|
|
Other Energy (please describe) |
(define measure of scale) |
|
|
Non-energy (please describe) |
(define measure of scale) |
1-12. Briefly describe any significant changes in company structure (e.g., acquisitions and divestitures), sectors, and product lines during the last five years:
"Green Mountain Power shed two companies that were not producing acceptable profits. In 1998, we sold our propane gas subsidiary. In 1997, we sold a majority interest in a retail energy company started by Green Mountain Power, called Green Mountain Energy Resources, and early in 1999 we sold the rest of our interest in that company." 1998 Annual Report.
Has the company compensated for these, or other changes (e.g., new regulations), in establishing the environmental data included in this Report
? N/A.Section 2: Environmental Policies, Organization and Management
2-1. List all corporate environmental policies and their dates of issue and/or revision. Detail the geographic scope of these policies and indicate whether the texts of the policies are available to the public:
|
Policy |
Issue Date |
Latest Revision |
Geographic Scope |
Publicly Available? |
|
CERES Principles |
Adopted 12/1996 |
N/A |
Company-wide |
Yes |
|
Environmental Policy |
May 1997 |
N/A |
Company-wide |
Yes |
|
Recycling Policy |
1992 |
Spring 1998 |
Company-wide |
Yes |
Please comment on the scope of applicability. If policies are not global, do you have a plan to make them so? Over what time scale?
2-2. Which of the following are directly addressed by policies or associated guidance documents? Specify where not applicable to your company:
|
Environmental |
√ |
Health & Safety |
√ |
Water Quality |
Emergency Planning |
√ |
|
Air Quality |
Personnel Safety |
√ |
|
Energy Conservation Opportunities |
Transportation Safety |
||
Solid/Hazardous Waste |
√ |
Materials/Equipment Safety |
√ |
Storage Tanks |
√ |
Industrial Health/Hygiene |
|
Chemical Releases |
Occupational Medicine |
||
Spill Prevention |
√ |
Other (specify) |
|
Site Remediation |
|||
Chemical Inventory Reporting |
|||
Resource Use |
|||
Other (specify) |
2-3: Please describe your company’s approach to the issue of sustainability, focusing on the following three elements:
• How does it apply to your industry?
Edison Electric Institute is the association of shareholder-owned electric companies, international affiliates and industry associates worldwide. In its March 1998 publication titled "Everyone has a responsibility to protect
The electric industry is:
1. "…leading all U.S. Industries in taking voluntary actions to mitigate green house gases."
• What does it mean for your company?
On December 12, 1997 GMP’s CEO Christopher Dutton issued a ten point "Green Mountain Power Environmental Policy". Two of these ten principles directly addressed the notion of sustainability and all ten related indirectly to this concept. The two principles are:
"Promote sustainable development; that is, development that meets the needs and aspirations of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs; and
Manage Company-owned lands and natural resources to conserve them and use them in a sustainable manner."
Sustainable development is defined as "development that meets the needs and aspirations of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.
• How is your company making progress toward it?
No action in 1998.
2-4. Are your company's policies reviewed periodically to ensure their continuing relevance in light of changing standards, technology, and emerging concerns? Yes.
Explain:
2-5. What level of management is responsible for maintaining the currency of your corporate environmental policies and practices? Senior Management.
Explain: Environmental policy is developed at the senior management level by the senior vice president of corporate and legal affairs and the vice president for operations, both of whom report to the CEO. The primary responsibility for environmental compliance is executed at the middle management level. The Environmental Manager is directly responsible for the day-to-day development and implementation of the environmental compliance program. This individual is also responsible for developing a CERES-based environmental standard for Company operations.
The Environmental Manager reports to the CEO through the senior vice president, Corporate Development and Legal Affairs. Thus, the connection between the operational side of the company is closely linked to senior management. The position is simultaneously operations-based to the extent that the substantive compliance work filters directly into the operational side of the company through fieldwork, extensive field-based training programs and the direct, daily exchange of information between the management and operations side of the Company.
2-6. Is there an officer specifically designated with environmental responsibilities? Yes.
Explain: In 1997 the Company delegated oversight of Environmental, Health & Safety to the Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Legal Affairs.
2-7. Are there updates to senior management, the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors concerning the company's environmental activities? If yes, with what frequency? Yes.
Explain: The Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Legal Affairs reports weekly to other senior officers via a "brown bag" forum. There are quarterly reports to the Board of Directors via the "status report" book that communicates important information to the Board.
2-8. Are environmental compliance and operational decisions principally handled in centralized or decentralized fashion? Centralized.
Explain: The Environmental Manager is responsible for overall company-wide environmental compliance. Specially trained employees who work out of GMP’s district operations facilities are responsible for day-to-day environmental, health and safety compliance.
2-9. How is accountability for environmental performance organized in your company?
Accountability for environmental performance occurs in several ways at GMP. First level managers who have had extensive training in environmental, health and safety issues are responsible for compliance at the operational or field level. They, in turn, are accountable to senior staff up through the ranks so that senior managers at the vice president level share ultimate responsibility for implementation of the environmental program.
At the same time, accountability is tied to the various functional groups within the Company. Each operational unit has training and compliance responsibilities unique to it. Supervisory staff in each operational unit is accountable to senior management who reviews the Company’s performance.
2-10. Is outstanding environmental performance of teams, operating units and individuals recognized internally?
No. GMP realizes that the need for employee recognition is important and needs to consider ways to incorporate employee recognition into its benefits program. Such appreciation, formalized in a recognition program, will benefit not only environmental performance, but will be valuable to all performance areas to the extent that appropriate recognition will improve employee morale and lead to enhanced employee performance.
If yes, how does such recognition occur (e.g. salary review, bonus, promotion, award, etc.)?
2-11. Are your employees encouraged to take the initiative, submit suggestions for improvement, and to suggest actions or policies that reduce the company’s environmental impact? Yes.
Explain; if yes, give specific examples of methods used to encourage employee initiative:
Green Mountain Power uses an electronic publication called the "Update." This regular update report encourages employee suggestions and questions on all subjects, including environmental issues. Questions are directed to the proper employee for a response and an answer is returned in a short period of time.
2-12. A) Does your company have, or provide access to, educational programs in which employees with environmental responsibilities participate to update their skills and knowledge? Yes.
Explain; if yes, give specific examples:
One of the Company’s strengths is the nature and extent of on-going educational programs that are designed to promote environmental awareness and responsibility among workers. To date, this training has involved the majority of operational workers involved with fieldwork. The educational topics range from the regulatory requirements for handling hazardous and solid waste and spill response to encouraging stewardship through voluntary initiatives such as waste minimization and recycling programs.
The training program involves all field personnel who receive a minimum of two hours and as many as 20 hours of environmental, health and safety training on an annual basis. This includes review of spill response procedures, especially spills that may contain PCBs or ones that may affect the "navigable waters of the United States." It also includes emergency response procedures at GMP’s generating stations and compliance issues related to the handling, transport and storage of Company-generated hazardous and solid waste.
The Health and Safety component of the training program includes hazardous communications which focus on methods and observations for detecting the presence of hazardous chemicals or materials. It also focuses on use of Material Safety Data Sheets and other markers that may be important for understanding an emergency situation. These classes are presented upon initial assignment and reviewed every three years thereafter.
Respirator compliance is offered to all operational employees on an annual basis.
B) Does your company have educational and informational programs in which all other employees participate to update their skills and knowledge and ensure their understanding and implementation of the company’s environmental policies? Yes
Explain; if yes, give specific examples of nature of program, frequency, and percentage of employees reached:
As noted above in response 2-11, the question and answer forum in the "update" provides an effective clearinghouse for the kind of information that these questions addresses. It is particularly effective because it is able to reach and serve all GMP personnel on a basis, thus providing consistent information to all workers simultaneously.
As Green Mountain Power continues to incorporate the CERES Principles into its way of doing business, such education and information-exchange opportunities will be expanded and improved.
2-13. A) Does your company sponsor scientific or policy research devoted to environmental technology, management, and performance issues, or other relevant research areas, at educational or research institutions? Yes.
Explain; If yes, provide up to three specific examples:
Green Mountain Power has an agreement with Hydro-Quebec that provides access to Hydro-Quebec’s research facilities and resources. Research projects have been initiated which provide various economic, energy savings and/or environmental benefits. Three examples are:
The super-capacitor is a device that has the potential to improve the performance of electric vehicles while extending the life of batteries. This technology will be installed in an electric vehicle currently owned by GMP.
B) Does your company participate in external activities designed to share the results of such scientific and policy research? Yes.
Explain; if yes give specific activities and noteworthy accomplishments:
Unless the research is for a customer and is confidential it can be shared with others.
2-14. To what degree does your company use internal environmental cost information to support internal decision-making? Is this done through a managerial cost accounting system or other financial management system which routinely compiles, analyzes, and reports on environmental costs?
In either case, give examples of;
• Which environmental costs (e.g., management costs, resource use, waste disposal, permitting, monitoring, training, auditing, insurance);
• At what level (e.g., product, process, facility, division, corporate):
Green Mountain Power has established a separate responsibility center for its environmental department. Payroll and O&M costs are thereby tracked. The O&M budget accumulates training and travel costs, along with outside service costs, expendable equipment charges, industry dues, subscriptions, publications, etc. The payroll budget picks up those employees working in the designated environmental cost center or those who cross-charge the cost center for work on environmental projects. A separate project number can be set up by the environmental department manager to tracks costs according to specific projects, products and so on. The Company has two such project accounts established, one for environmental policy development and one for environmental training.
For what purpose is this cost information compiled?
This information is compiled for analytical purposes, use in our regulatory process and for actual to budget reporting purposes.
Please describe any successes or challenges experienced in developing/applying this system. How did these experiences compare to your expectations?
This application is a normal function of our accounting system and as such we have not had any particular challenges or successes.
If such a system is not in place, are there plans underway to create an environmental cost tracking system? If not, why not? If plans do exist, what steps toward implementation have been made?
2-15. Does your company normalize environmental information (e.g., chemical release, energy usage, greenhouse gas emissions) by an activity unit within the company (e.g., per unit of output, per unit of input, per labor hour, per employee)? No.
If yes, please describe the approach adopted. What successes or challenges were faced in developing/applying these normalization techniques? How did these experiences compare to your initial expectations?
If no, does your company have plans to do so in the future? If not, why not?
The database for all waste tracking will be in place by January 1, 2000. This will be expanded to include energy usage by the year 2001.
AUDITS
2-16. Does your company have programs for workplace health, safety and environmental auditing? Yes.
Explain; if yes, describe these programs, including audit frequency, scope of audits, and structure (e.g., consolidated health, safety and environmental audits, or separate audits):
Workplace Health and Safety:
Safety field audits, with the focus on safety and health, are done for employees on an ongoing basis. The frequency varies depending on the time of year.
Department of Transportation (DOT) audits are performed by outside contractors.
Facilities audits are done on a monthly basis. The focus is on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliance but environmental deficiencies may be picked up as well.
Environmental
An environmental audit of records was conducted in May 1998.
The Company has had for more than ten years an active internal inspection program in which plants and facilities are inspected for compliance with state and federal regulations.
2-17. Are your audits conducted by company personnel or outside individuals/organizations? Both.
If both, what is the ratio of company personnel to outside auditors?
Company personnel conduct about 99% of the health and safety audits while the remaining 1% is conducted by outside sources.
In the environmental arena, 80% of the audits (inspections) are conducted by GMP personnel.
2-18. Do your audit programs apply worldwide? No.
Explain: Green Mountain Power operates only in the State of Vermont.
2-19. Are your audit systems administered on a company-wide basis, on a site basis, or on the basis of distinct operations?
Explain; give details of sites and operations audited:
Inspections, not audits, are conducted internally by Green Mountain Power personnel throughout the Company at all sites subject to state and federal laws.
2-20. Which of the following are part of your audit (inspection) programs?
|
Environmental |
√ |
Health & Safety |
√ |
Compliance |
√ |
Compliance |
√ |
Management Systems |
Management Systems |
||
Spill Prevention |
√ |
Emergency Planning |
|
Water Quality |
√ |
Personnel Safety |
√ |
Air Quality |
Transportation Safety |
√ |
|
Solid/Hazardous Waste |
√ |
Process Safety Management |
√ |
Storage Tanks |
√ |
Materials/Equipment Safety |
√ |
Chemical Releases |
Industrial Health/Hygiene |
||
Site Remediation |
Occupational Medicine |
||
Chemical Registration/Certification |
Other (specify) |
||
Resource Use |
|||
Other (specify) |
Comments:
2-21. Does your company have an internal energy audit program for identifying conservation opportunities and progress? Yes.
Explain:
Green Mountain Power utilizes internal energy efficiency engineers that work in the Energy Services Department to work with Corporate Services facilities managers in assessing energy efficiency opportunities at all corporate facilities. Facilities staff request technical analyses, site visits and new construction plan reviews on a regular basis for energy efficiency project assessment and implementation consideration. Energy engineers respond to the specific request.
2-22. Are the results of your audit findings reported to senior management and/or the board of directors? No.
Explain: Audit recommendations are reviewed by facility managers for implementation considerations. The facility managers have the authority to implement cost-effective efficiency upgrades based on O&M budget allocations. Cost-effective efficiency upgrades are automatically implemented on energy consuming appliances requiring replacement.
2-23. What areas (divisions, operations) of your company have been audited over the last two years?
None formally. However, individual energy efficiency projects company-wide are presented to Energy Services Department engineering staff for evaluation. Engineering and economic analyses are conducted and forwarded to Facilities staff for consideration.
2-24. Are your audit programs reviewed by an independent organization? No.
If yes, does the review include the following:
(√)
Program Content
Site Selection
Coverage
Frequency
Protocols
Audit Team Selection
Reporting of Results
Corrective Action Planning and Tracking
Other
Please identify outside reviewer, if publicly available:
If no, are there plans underway to utilize an independent review in the future?
Since Green Mountain Power delivers efficiency programs to a customer base of 80,000 and employs seven energy engineering professionals that conduct audits as part of their jobs, it is deemed unnecessary to incorporate outside review.
2-25. Are your audit results available to the public? No, but they could be.
2-26. Describe other notable aspects of your company's environmental policies, organization, and management not otherwise covered in this section:
Section 3: Workplace Health and Safety
3-1. Briefly describe your company’s activities in the area of workplace health and safety. Give examples of specific programs, accomplishments, awards and/or training activities, etc., that go beyond the requirements of the law:
The Safety and Health program consists of training, audits, and hazard awareness building. Constant analysis reveals where problems exist. Special attention is focused on such areas.
A positive discipline policy has emphasized coaching in areas where infractions of the rules occur. However, there are mechanisms in place to permit progressive discipline where serious problems exist.
Green Mountain Power has an aggressive back-to-work policy. Injured employees come back on light duty as soon as permitted by their physicians.
Office workstations are adjustable to accommodate the individual needs of employees.
"Work Injury prevention Workshops" have been offered to all employees. The workshops are presented by a professional physical therapist and focus on how to work more safely and effectively at work, e.g., understanding the limitations and the need for proper stretching and use of equipment.
Hardhats are required to be used at all times in the field, even when there isn’t a specific hazard exposure. The purpose is to encourage a habit of wearing this protective equipment so it will be used when needed.
How are these programs and other workplace health and safety related-related information communicated to employees?
GMP updates employees through monthly meetings and e-mail communication.
3-2. A) Does your company communicate with workers on health and safety-related information by, for example, sharing internal safety audits, internal compliance audits, etc.? Yes.
When audits occur, a discussion follows with the overall findings, emphasizing not only the violations, but the areas of compliance as well.
Bulletin boards are located in each district office and have updated safety propaganda posted constantly.
B) Does your company provide, or is it willing to provide, workers with the following information about specific facilities?
|
Provide |
Willing to Provide? |
Not Applicable |
|
|
Chemical release data (please specify) |
X |
||
|
Chemical use and storage data (including radioactive material) |
X |
||
|
Worst case accident scenarios |
X |
||
|
Internal safety audits |
X |
||
|
Internal compliance audits |
X |
||
|
Material transportation risks (including radioactive material) |
X |
||
|
Process hazards analyses |
X |
||
|
Pollution prevention plans |
X |
||
|
Other information gathered for the CERES Report |
X |
Comments:
The Company is forthcoming with all information related to these kinds of risks and risk evaluations. As part of GMP’s on-going program to reduce risk and improve communications, among both its employees and the greater community, it shares information, as it becomes available, with those who would benefit most.
3-3. What challenges and successes has your company experienced in the area of workplace health and safety?
Behavior modification can be difficult when updating or changing work procedures as a result of new regulations.
Secondly, the area of Safety and Health has so many constantly changing rules and regulations, it is difficult to know and comply with all of them at all times.
3-4. Provide information on workplace safety performance using normalized measures such as lost days. Provide such information for a base year, 1996, 1997, 1998 and a target year:
|
Year |
Injuries |
Lost Days |
Fatalities |
Incidence Rate |
|
1996 |
9 |
109 |
0 |
3.68 |
|
1997 |
5 |
54 |
0 |
1.58 |
|
1998 |
11 |
109 |
0 |
3.53 |
Explain: The incidence rate is calculated to reflect the rate of lost time injuries and can compare with any industry or any number of employees. For comparison, the incidence rate for our Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 49, was 3.80 in 1997.
3-5. Do you use other measures for workplace health and safety performance? Please explain and give trends:
Each injury or vehicle accident is entered into a database. From that database reports can be generated to reflect the type of injury, age group of the injured employees, locations where these injuries occur, specific department performance, etc. With this data, an accurate determination can be made regarding the type and amount of training that is needed to improve performance and decrease injuries.
3-6. Describe other notable aspects of your company’s workplace health and safety not otherwise covered in this section:
Emphasis is placed on management training. Managers are taught about the regulations and their responsibilities as agents of the company to enforce them. They also learn how to perform personnel and facility audits, and how to conduct hazard analyses.
Section 4: Community Participation and Accountability
4-1. Does your company have a policy/procedure to consider community impacts in its decision-making?
As a company that operates in a regulated environment, most major decisions receive a comprehensive review in the public arena. Through formal and informal channels the Vermont Department of Public Service comments on Green Mountain Power proposals on behalf of the Vermont public. In some cases formal public hearings serve as a forum for comments.
Green Mountain Power’s formal and informal policies encourage employees to solicit public input from a variety of channels.
Does this policy provide for direct community involvement? If so, with which groups? How are these groups chosen? Yes. See descriptions above and below in this response.
How is this involvement organized (e.g., through community advisory panels, public hearings, newsletters, regular meetings, open forums)?
Green Mountain Power’s "public" is quite well defined - its 83,000 electric customers. For Green Mountain Power to succeed its customers must understand the business and the issues it faces. The Company’s monthly letter to customers delivers timely information on company successes, decisions that face the Company’s employees, and the results of the decision-making processes.
Informal involvement with constituent groups is also essential to Green Mountain Power, especially when sensitive environmental issues are being reviewed and resolved. For example, in the late 1980s, Green Mountain Power proposed to build a six megawatt, eleven turbine wind farm on a ridgeline in southern Vermont. One of the early tasks was to meet with environmental groups that support both preservation of natural areas and the production of renewable energy. With the help and insight of these groups, Green Mountain Power assessed the public reaction to the impacts of construction and access to previously unoccupied natural areas. Together they considered how these negative factors would be balanced to the positive benefits of producing electricity from the wind. To the benefit of Vermont and Green Mountain Power’s customers, the Searsburg Wind Power Facility was commissioned in 1997.
4-2. Does your company proactively seek the advice and counsel of independent community groups (e.g., through newsletters, regular meetings, open forums, or community oversight committees) regarding possible risks posed by your operations?
Explain: The nature of Green Mountain Power’s business is such that this kind of commitment is largely unnecessary. The communications that are required are met in other ways, e.g., through regulatory requirements, contingency plans, and other mandated notifications procedures. Cases where additional risk communications might be necessary would be construction or demolition work at a plant or facility. In this instance, the Company’s facility manager works with the local planning commission to assure that all permits notifications and other requirements are met. These situations are rare, but they are covered through Green Mountain Power’s standard protocols regarding notification and communications within communities where Green Mountain Power operates.
4-3. Are employees encouraged to participate in community activities aimed at improving environmental quality? Yes.
Explain; if yes, give specific examples of methods used to encourage such activities and noteworthy results:
In Green Mountain Power’s view one of the most important methods of improving environmental commitment lies with children and their understanding of conserving energy and producing it in a sustainable manner. To foster this goal, Green Mountain Power enlisted the support of its employees to speak about the energy business to their communities and children in their schools.
4-4. List up to three community-oriented environmental activities sponsored by your company:
1. For several years, GMP has been a leading sponsor of a statewide effort to promote electric vehicles. Working with state government, other utilities and environmental groups, the Company has used human and financial resources to conduct in-the-field research into use of electric vehicles in cold climates.
4-5. What challenges and successes has your company faced in the area of community participation and accountability?
Throughout the 1990s, Green Mountain Power has been faced with a major environmental challenge – potential responsibility for a Superfund site and government clean up proposals that would have had serious financial consequences for the Company. As the following paragraphs from Green Mountain Power’s 1998 Annual Report indicate, through the hard work of a community based team which includes key Green Mountain Power representatives, the end product is now being viewed as a model of community participation and accountability. Most importantly, it is a solution that fits the nature of the site and character of Vermont.
"In June 1998, the Coordinating Council reached a consensus agreement on a recommended plan for remediation of the Pine Street Barge Canal site. As part of the Council’s process of reaching a consensus recommendation, the Company and certain other parties conditionally agreed to fund environmentally beneficial projects in the greater Burlington area, the cost of which may reach $3 million. In June 1998, the EPA formally proposed the Council’s recommended plan and received public comments.
On September 1998, the EPA issued its final Record of Decision, announcing selection of the proposal remedy. The proposed remedy includes:
The Pine Street Barge Canal site solution provides an excellent example of how community participation can achieve the best result for the environment and for the region. In the process, all parties benefited.
4-6. How are environmental considerations incorporated into your company’s public policy activities?
Environmental considerations are incorporated into virtually every policy, both corporate and public, in force at GMP at this time. The Company’s corporate mission statement includes a strong commitment to environmental protection; the GMP Board of Directors in 1997 adopted an environmental policy that tracks consistently with the CERES Principles; the Company uses an environmental screen in evaluating all power sources; GMP supported successful efforts to create a statewide Energy Efficiency Utility; and, as a key part of human resource policy, all field personnel at GMP are required to undergo extensive and continuing training in environmental protection.
4-7. Environmental justice refers to actions in support of populations most negatively affected by environmental factors, as they tend largely to be those populations most vulnerable due to economic, political, racial or other factors. In support of the goals of environmental justice, describe if and how your company ensures protection of particularly vulnerable or at-risk groups in communities directly affected by your activities:
Vermont has a relatively low level of economic, political and racial diversity. Consequently, the issue of environmental justice has not come up insofar as Vermont populations are concerned.
These issues have touched Vermont and its electric utilities, however, through the power purchase agreements between Vermont utilities and Hydro-Quebec. The development of large-scale hydro projects in Quebec has affected native peoples in Quebec. To the extent that Green Mountain Power purchases power from these sources, it is involved peripherally with this issue.
Beyond this issue, several factors provide assurance that when such issues arise, they will be handled in an appropriate manner. First, Green Mountain Power is a relatively small organization with a responsive management that is sensitive to environmental and social issues. Second, Vermont as a state is extremely sensitive to environmental issues. And finally, compared with other electric utilities, Green Mountain Power engages in relatively few activities that have significant negative environmental impacts.
4-8. Does your company provide, or is it willing to provide, the following information about specific facilities to communities in which company operations are located?
|
Provide |
Willing to Provide? |
Not Applicable |
|
|
Chemical release data (please specify) |
X |
||
|
Chemical use and storage data (including radioactive material) |
X |
||
|
Worst case accident scenarios |
X |
||
|
Internal safety audits |
X |
||
|
Internal compliance audits |
X |
||
|
Material transportation risks (including radioactive material) |
X |
||
|
Process hazards analyses |
X |
||
|
Pollution prevention plans |
X |
||
|
Resource conservation plans |
X |
||
|
Other information gathered for the CERES Report |
X |
Comments:
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
4-9. Does your company have trained personnel and equipment capable of handling chemical emergencies that your plants might experience, including those that might involve radioactive materials? Yes.
Explain: The Company does not engage in traditional manufacturing; therefore, it does not anticipate "chemical" emergencies. It does, however, purchase and store small quantities of fuel and mineral oil at various locations throughout its service territory, both in its generation plans and its substation transformers. These products have the potential to cause harm, both to the environment and to public health, if released into the environment. Consequently, an important component of the environmental management program is training in the area of emergency response preparedness.
Second, Green Mountain Power has been conscientious in testing its fuel storage tanks, both above and below ground. In recent years, it has removed its underground fuel storage tanks because of the liability involved with such storage systems. At the same time, it maintains generous supplies of emergency response materials and equipment in locations where large quantities of fuel are stored.
Assuring that Green Mountain Power has personnel capable of using the equipment necessary to respond to a large spill at any of Green Mountain Power’s power production plants is one of the main training responsibilities of the Environmental Manager. This manager develops and conducts extensive training annually and works to assure that the Company’s personnel can respond to most emergency situations quickly and effectively. The Company also keeps an active roster of outside consultants apprised of the type and magnitude of potential problems that could occur at its larger facilities.
Training programs are designed to incorporate personnel from response contractors into them in order to familiarize contractors with the plant operations with which they could become involved. This has afforded both Green Mountain Power personnel and contractors a degree of confidence that will be beneficial in actual emergency response situations.
4-10. Does your company conduct training exercises with firefighters and rescue teams in all communities where research and development and production facilities are located? Yes.
Explain: Green Mountain Power works in the communities where it has plants and facilities to assure there is communication and cooperation between Company personnel and neighbors in the event of an emergency. This includes, in some cases, working with local fire fighters, rescue, police and other public safety officials. For example, Green Mountain Power personnel have trained 56 fire departments in electrical safety and/or confined space awareness in 1998. The Berlin Fire Department Trainer assisted in classroom training in 1998.
4-11. Does your company keep local emergency responders informed of risks created by, or chemicals used by, your operations?
Explain: Please see responses to 4-9 and 4-10. In addition, through the Community Right-to-Know reporting requirements, all Green Mountain Power facilities that store large amounts of fuel are required to assess annually the type and amount of fuel stored at each site. This information is distributed to all public safety officials who need to have this information. Again, fuel oil and mineral oils are the only products that are stored in quantities sufficient to pose environmental or public safety threats.
4-12. Are the neighbors at your plant sites informed of the existence of any procedures and evacuation plans that may be needed in case of an incident?
Explain: No. See responses to 4-10 and 4-11.
4-13. Describe other notable aspects of your company’s involvement with communities directly affected by your activities not otherwise covered in this section:
The Company is involved in public Safety Awareness Days, and is an active participant on Safety Councils for various state and national organizations.
GMP’s Safety Manager is on the Board of Directors for the Vermont Safety & Health Council, Chairperson of the Safety Committee for the Electric Council of New England, Director of Safety for the Vermont Civil Air Patrol and is Founder and Director of the Vermont Electric Utility Safety & Environmental Consortium covering the 22 Vermont utilities.
Section 5: Product Stewardship
5-1. Does your company have a formal policy requiring an environmental, health, and safety evaluation of its new and existing energy products and services (e.g., rate structures, "green" power offerings, conservation services)? No.
If yes, how can this be obtained by the public?
5-2. Does your company have procedures in place to monitor the commitments it makes in this policy?
Explain: See response to 5-1.
5-3. Has your company instituted procedures to assist energy product and service designers create products or services (e.g., rate structures, "green" power offerings, energy efficiency services) with the potential for lowered environmental impact? No.
If yes, which of the following are considered?
• Fuel Source
• Conversion Efficiency
• Level of Use
Comments:
5-4. What are the major positive and negative environmental and safety impacts potentially associated with the use or misuse of services and products your company provides its customers? (Note: do not include impacts of production or supply here.)
In some circumstances Public Safety may be jeopardized by damage to power lines, i.e., ice storm damage, wires down, trees on lines, etc.
If possible, estimate this impact for products sold over the last three years (e.g., injuries resulting from product use): None.
Describe any programs or procedures designed to prevent or minimize any such misuse:
There are two ways to misuse electricity: one is to waste it when it can be used more efficiently and the other is to use it in an unsafe manner. To ensure that customers use electricity safely, Green Mountain Power regularly communicates with its customers using bill inserts. Specific messages are targeted to parents to urge them to teach their children about electrical safety, to construction workers to be aware of overhead lines when they work at a site, to people cutting wood to check for power lines nearby as well as offering frequent messages for electrical safety around the home. Green Mountain Power’s safety manager also does training of children in our schools and other places.
5-5. Describe demand side management, energy efficiency services, or other "green" service activities undertaken by your company (e.g., energy audits, weatherization programs). Provide information on the number of customers served:
In 1998 Green Mountain Power (GMP) provided energy efficiency services through nine distinct programs to over 4,000 customers. Energy savings totaled approximately 8,300 MWh, or 0.5% of GMP’s annual MWh sales, enough energy to supply 1,050 average households in Vermont for one year. Since 1992, we have helped our customers reduce their annual electric usage by a cumulative 79,000 MWh, or 4.4% of projected usage without Demand-Side Management.
5-6. Describe consumer energy efficiency and environmental education programs undertaken by your company.
In 1998 GMP was an active member in a number of regional and national energy efficiency organizations. These included the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnership (NEEP), an organization dedicated to developing region-wide programs promoting market transformation to higher energy standards, and the Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE), an organization dedicated to promoting a consistent set of energy efficiency standards nation-wide. At the national level GMP continued its affiliation with federal energy conservation initiatives by remaining a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Energy Star Building Partner, a GreenLights Energy Star Program Utility Ally and a GreenLights Energy Star Program Surveyor. Along with EPA’s initiatives, GMP was also a U.S. Department of Energy Motor Challenge Ally.
5-7. Does your company’s rate structure promote reduced consumption? If so, how?
Yes. Green Mountain Power sets the retail price above the marginal cost.
5-8. What challenges and successes has your company faced in the area of product stewardship?
Since 1992 GMP has offered comprehensive services to its customers to promote the efficient use of electrical energy. In 1998 these services achieved a savings of 8,300 MWH or 0.5% of GMP's annual sales, enough energy to supply 1,505 average households in Vermont for one year. This was a 1% increase in savings over 1997. Like all aspects of the electrical utility business today, the challenge in 1998 was to provide energy efficiency services to customers more effectively and with substantially less personnel. GMP met this challenge by exceeding its 1998 savings goal by 3.5% while reducing staff required to deliver these services by 42%.
5-9. Describe other notable aspects of your company's product stewardship activities not otherwise covered in this section:
Green Mountain Power makes a conscious effort to use power from renewable resources, rather than fossil fuels. The 1998 fuel mix demonstrates the extent to which we were successful:
Hydro: 44%, nuclear: 27.5%, coal: 2.0%, oil: 1.5%, gas: 2.4%, wood 3.5%, wind 0.6%, opportunity purchases (can’t break down by fuel): 18.5%
This power supply both reduces air emissions and preserves natural resources for future generations.
Section 6: Supplier Relationships
FUEL SUPPLIERS
6-1. Does your company have a policy to incorporate environmental criteria in the selection of fuel suppliers? Is this policy globally applicable?
(Note: If your company supplies its own fuel (e.g., mine mouth coal-fired plants), please answer for those operations as well.)
Explain: Green Mountain Power purchases gas and diesel for our company vehicles, #2 fuel oil for our diesel plants and #1 kerosene for our gas turbine plant. The prospective suppliers are sent a checklist indicating what is required in the mix but ultimately the major variables which our purchasing department looks at are price and delivery.
6-2. When selecting suppliers, does your company consider criteria such as the following? Explain: See response to 6-1.
• Determining whether the fuel supplier has the necessary environmental permits:
• Determining whether the fuel supplier has an environmental management system in place:
• Conducting a physical evaluation of the fuel supplier's facility:
• Reviewing the fuel supplier’s:
Impact on local environment in extraction of fuels:
Use of hazardous substances in extraction of fuels:
Chemical composition of fuel (e.g., sulfur in coal):
Impact of fuel delivery:
Generation and management of waste:
Compliance record:
Workplace health and safety practices:
• Working cooperatively with a fuel supplier to develop environmentally preferable processes, materials, and products:
• Giving preference to fuels extracted locally
• Determining whether the supplier has third party accreditation:
• Other:
OTHER SUPPLIERS
6-3. Does your company have a policy to incorporate environmental criteria in the selection of suppliers for other (i.e., non-fuel) goods and services it purchases? Is this policy globally applicable?
There is currently no Company-wide policy to incorporate environmental criteria in supplier choices.
6-4. When selecting such suppliers, does your company consider criteria such as the following?
(Note: Specific materials procurement requirements (e.g. recycled content, equipment energy efficiency) and energy source preferences (e.g., natural gas vs. oil vs. coal) are addressed in Section 8.)
|
Yes |
No |
N/A |
|
|
Supplier’s use of environmentally preferable materials |
|||
|
Materials use efficiency of supplier operations |
|||
|
Energy use efficiency of supplier operations |
|||
|
Hazardous waste management practices |
|||
|
Solid waste management practices |
|||
|
Final waste and emissions volumes for supplier operations |
|||
|
EHS compliance record |
Explain: Services specific to the Environmental department are examined for some criteria listed above, but practices are not universal.
6-5. If applicable, describe specifically how supplier environmental performance influenced a recent procurement decision.
6-6. Does your company actively share its knowledge of environmentally preferable processes with its suppliers, or work proactively in some other way with its suppliers to develop environmentally preferable materials, products, processes, or services?
Explain:
6-7. Please explain how your company monitors the environmental performance of suppliers. For example, do you conduct a physical evaluation of suppliers’ or vendors’ facilities, evaluate records and data provided by suppliers or vendors, rely on a statement from the supplier or vendor, and/or make use of third party certification or review?
Site visits are not a normal part of the evaluation process. This is due to the Company’s limited resources, both financial and staffing. It does rely, instead, on published audits to which it has access through various industry-related affiliations. It also relies on information gathered through industry-related forums that exist for the purpose of information sharing and networking. Occasionally field audits are carried out but these are infrequent, usually only when the facility in question is located within driving distance of Green Mountain Power’s service territory.
6-8. If your company purchases energy (e.g., electricity or natural gas) for resale, what environmental criteria, if any, does it incorporate in selecting a supplier?
The Company’s energy mix is approximately 48% Green Power.
6-9. Does your company have procedures in place to monitor its supplier selection criteria? No.
Explain: The Company has no formalized procedures regarding any of its environmental purchasing policies.
6-10. What challenges and successes has your company experienced in the area of supplier relations?
GMP has a very good relationship with our new alliance partner CED Twin State. Twin State will now be the Company’s sole supplier for electrical supplies. GMP is delegating to Twin State a lot of the electrical responsibilities it had in the past. For example, GMP has set up the White River, Bellows Falls and Wilmington stockrooms for Twin State to service the inventory. Twin State will on a regular basis inventory, order and shelf all stock that is delivered. This allows GMP to have a lower inventory on our books and will save time and money for the Company. Twin State will also keep a closer watch on items that require long lead time.
6-11. Describe other notable aspects of your company's supplier relations activities not otherwise covered in this section:
Section 7: Energy Acquisition, Conversion, Distribution, and Sales
ELECTRICITY
Generation
7-1. Are you a generator of electricity? Yes.
If yes, please provide information on primary energy sources in a table formatted like that below:
|
Quantity Used |
%age of |
MWh |
marketed |
|||||||
|
Natural Units |
total |
generated |
steam |
% of total |
||||||
|
Amount |
Unit |
BTUs |
BTUs used |
from source |
% of total generation |
produced (BTUs) |
marketed steam |
|||
|
Combustible Fuels |
||||||||||
|
Oil (Diesel & Kerosene) |
36,547.0 |
17% |
||||||||
|
Coal |
N/A |
|||||||||
|
Natural Gas combustion |
N/A |
|||||||||
|
Biomass |
N/A |
|||||||||
|
Other Fuel (specify) |
||||||||||
|
Unknown Fuel (explain) |
||||||||||
|
Total Use |
100% |
|||||||||
|
Other |
||||||||||
|
Hydro (excluding pumped storage) |
162,158.2 |
77% |
||||||||
|
Nuclear |
||||||||||
|
Solar |
||||||||||
|
Wind |
||||||||||
|
Geothermal |
12,886.3 |
6% |
||||||||
|
Other Non-Fuel Source (specify) |
||||||||||
|
Unknown Source (explain) |
||||||||||
|
Total Generation (MWhs/BTUs) |
211,591.5 |
100% |
100% |
|||||||
Transmission/Di